Talk:Cross Ray (XC1)

Alvis' vs. Alvis's
In the sentence "Cross Ray (クロスレイ, Cross Ray) is one of Alvis' Battle Arts", I'm pretty sure it should be "Alvis's" rather than "Alvis' ". It'd be "Alvis' " if Alvis were a plural (e.g. "the Giants' treasure"), but since it's singular the possessive is with an apostrophe s even though 'Alvis' itself ends in s. [https://www.thepunctuationguide.com/apostrophe.html#:~:text=The%20general%20rule%20is%20that,ends%20in%20s%20or%20not.&text=The%20possessive%20of%20a%20plural,a%20letter%20other%20than%20s. (Here's a source.)] It probably doesn't matter a huge amount, but I don't think it and similar instances should be deliberately changed from "Alvis's" to "Alvis' " (or equivalent). Rtg142857 (talk) 07:58, 11 March 2022 (EST)
 * According to SmashWiki (yeah they aren't us but we use NIWA wikis for inspiration a lot), both  and   are correct in both Englishes. So I would agree that editing just to change one to the other is a waste of time. STM (t) 08:10, 11 March 2022 (EST)