Xeno Series Wiki talk:Featured articles

Proposal
I support in general, although I'm a little cautious about the "It should not be full of redlinks" soft criterion. I understand the idea that not being a dead end is a quality in and of itself, but (especially at this early point in the wiki's lifespan, and also when a new game comes out) there will likely be very few articles that are 'complete' in their links and for which all but very few of those links are to actual pages. An alternative that keeps the spirit of the original idea might be 'The majority (or some other suitable quantifier) of its links should not be redlinks'? Such pages wouldn't be dead ends as long as they have a good number of working links; this wording would allow for significantly more pages that are themselves complete in their content. (edit: original post was at 09:55 BST, forgot the signature whoops) Rtg142857 (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2022 (EST)
 * Basically the intent was "if you glance down this article does it seem more full of red or full of blue?". I don't think your wording change alters this at all actually; in fact as a soft rule it probably shouldn't have a qualifier on it. STM (t) 17:02, 10 November 2022 (EST)
 * Ah, fair enough. I misinterpreted it as 'it should not have a lot of redlinks', but yeah, if that's the intent then I agree. Rtg142857 (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2022 (EST)

I've made some slight changes: STM (t) 08:16, 16 November 2022 (EST)
 * Spoiler-filled articles are now allowed to be FAs. They aren't allowed in the main page rotation. Whether a FA is "public" or "hidden" is decided during discussion.
 * There will be a page that lists all FA blurbs. Normally a page that duplicates the job of a category is not good, but FAs are supposed to be eye candy.