Xeno Series Wiki:Featured articles

Featured articles are the cream of the crop, the best articles the wiki has to offer. This is obviously a pretty subjective measurement, so we have a process for determining whether an article should be featured or not.

Criteria
These are the hard and soft criteria for whether an article can even be considered for featured status.

Hard criteria
If an article fails any of these checks, it is not a valid featured article at all.
 * It must not be a stub.
 * It must not be obviously incomplete. An incomplete tag on a section that's already mostly filled out might be okay; such a tag on a section that's entirely empty is not.
 * It must have at least one image, if it makes sense. Articles about music or dialogue do not need images, but most other things will.
 * It must not be on a subject that is a spoiler simply by existing. Featured articles may appear on the main page, and we don't want to shove blatant spoilers in visitors' faces.

Soft criteria
If an article fails any of these, they will count against it in the nomination process.
 * It should not have any sort of cleanup or maintenance tag. Featured articles should not need help.
 * It should not be full of redlinks. Featured articles should not be a dead end.
 * It should pass our spoiler policy.

Suggesting
To suggest an article become featured, a user should add a new section on its talk page similar to the following:

Nomination for featured status
(explain yourself here) ~ (The name of the section isn't that important, it's the template that is, since it will alert users to there being a nomination in progress.)

Users are then free to vote and discuss. You could simply post, but this is not a vote count - it is the strength of your argument that will decide the result, not the number of "yes"es and "no"es.

Discussions should last for at least a week. After this, if it looks like consensus has been achieved, a staff member may close the discussion by removing the  and adding one of these to the end of the discussion: Then, if the result was "passed",  is added to the article iteself. Hooray!
 * if there is clear agreement to feature the article
 * if there is clear agreement to not feature the article
 * is there is no clear agreement either way

Staff have the power to close any nomination for pages that clearly fail the hard criteria. Using the "failed" template in this case is optional.

Retrying
An article that failed to become featured in the past may improve enough to succeed if nominated again. There is no hard limit on how much time or effort needs to happen before another nomination is allowed, but for any re-nomination, the nominator must outline in their initial suggestion how they believe the article now succeeds where it previously failed.

Note that talk page sections should generally avoid sharing the exact same name. Using "Nomination for featured status (2)" instead is a fair idea.

Revoking
It is possible (however unlikely) for a featured article to drop back below the necessary standards of quality. If a user believes this has happened, they may offer the article back up for discussion. Everything proceeds exactly as with a new nomination - the result is still either "yes" or "no". In other words, there is no separate process for de-featuring.

This may result in an article remaining featured despite no longer meeting the hard criteria. This is okay - there's always enough time to revert it back to its featured state, after all.